Subaru WRX Forums banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,247 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/05/e...uba-lap-times/

;D
It didn't take long for Japan's journalists to get the new STI and EVO X side by side, and the results are now officially in. Tsukuba circuit regulars Kazuo Shimizu and Manabu Kawaguchi spent an afternoon thrashing around the notoriously twisty short circuit just north of Tokyo and here (drum roll please) are the best times they could ring out of the AWD rivals:

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X : 1:06:46

Subaru Impreza WRX STI : 1:05:95

So there you have it. The new engine placed further forward in the engine bay of the EVO X than in the EVO IX has indeed proven to be a handicap, while the STI's "wheel at each corner" longer wheelbase plus new double wishbone rear suspension has proved its worth.

Neither car is quite as quick as its immediate ancestor though. Check out this 15 year rivalry of the EVO vs the STI as recorded at Tsukuba:

............EVO / STI

2006 1:05:07 / 1:04:72

2005 1:04.88 / 1:04:17

2003 1:05:30 / 1:04:69

2001 1:05:17 / 1:06:56

1998 1:04:69 / 1:06:73

1996 1:07:00 / 1:05:92

1994 1:06:52 / 1:06:26

1992 1:10:90 / 1:07:99
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,397 Posts
I'm guessing that the 1 or 2 second difference between recent model years in the STI could come from weather conditions and different drivers...i imagine the weather is different every year and that they don't get the same drivers year to year either...then again I could be wrong :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
273 Posts
Either or the Evo, is just hot garbage, but i wouldnt mind test driving one myself....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,522 Posts
The STi's took it home... Yeah. Wow, I am really impressed with the STI, it came from last place and ended up in first, I guess this solidifies the fact that the 3rd Gen is just better.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top